Paraguay

Question ID
Question Text
Weighted score
Max score
Raw score
Raw answer
A.0 National Action Plan Development (Section total) 77.71 100 3.855769231
A.1 National Action Plan Development: Inform 94.17 100 4.708333333
A.1.1 To what extent did the government proactively and transparently communicate a timeline outlining the National Action Plan development process? 5.25 5.25 3 To a large extent
A.1.2 To what extent did the government proactively and transparently communicate who the OGP point of contact for developing the action plan was, including their name, position, department/ministry, and contact details? 4.5 4.5 3 To a large extent
A.1.3 To what extent did the government proactively and transparently communicate who the minister or senior official with accountability and final decision making responsibility for the action plan is? 3.75 3.75 3 To a large extent
A.1.4 To what extent were all documents relating to the National Action Plan (e.g. draft National Action Plans, consultation documents, final National Action Plan) published? 6 6 3 To a large extent
A.1.5 To what extent were all documents relating to the National Action Plan (e.g. draft National Action Plans, consultation documents, final National Action Plan) made available in the official national language(s)? 3.5 5.25 2 To a moderate extent
A.1.6 To what extent were progress updates proactively and transparently published in a regular and timely fashion? 5.25 5.25 3 To a large extent
A.2 National Action Plan Development: Consult 86.67 100 4.55
A.2.1 To what extent did the government proactively and transparently communicate opportunities to be involved in the development of the National Action Plan? 6 6 3 To a large extent
A.2.2 To what extent was a public consultation (i.e. an open opportunity for any interested parties to respond to questions or a draft action plan) of a suitable duration held on the action plan? 3.5 5.25 2 To a moderate extent
A.2.3 To what extent was the information that the government made available prior to the start of the public consultation process sufficient to understand how it would work? 5.25 5.25 3 To a large extent
A.2.4 To what extent were inputs to the public consultation on the National Action Plan published? 4.5 4.5 3 To a large extent
A.2.5 To what extent was it communicated why inputs to the public consultation were or were not taken into account? 3.5 5.25 2 To a moderate extent
A.3 National Action Plan Development: Involve 75.86 100 3.3
A.3.1 To what extent were there frequent meetings between civil society organisations and the government on the action plan? 4.5 4.5 3 To a large extent
A.3.2 To what extent were the details of meetings (i.e. date, time, venue, topic) widely publicised? 4.5 4.5 3 To a large extent
A.3.3 To what extent were opportunities provided for remote participation in meetings? 4.5 4.5 3 To a large extent
A.3.4 To what extent were any meetings or events held outside of the capital? 0 3.75 0 Not at all
A.3.5 To what extent were minutes of meetings between civil society organisations and government on the National Action Plan published in an accessible place and format appropriate to local context? 3 4.5 2 To a moderate extent
A.4 National Action Plan Development: Collaborate 73.15 100 3.95
A.4.1 To what extent did government make attempts to engage citizens and grassroots (i.e. community and local level) civil society groups in the National Action Plan consultation process? 3.5 5.25 2 To a moderate extent
A.4.2 To what extent was civil society free to self-organise? 5.25 5.25 3 To a large extent
A.4.3 To what extent were government officials open about the political feasibility of adopting a commitment? 3.5 5.25 2 To a moderate extent
A.4.4 To what extent was the OGP Point of Contact and other lead government officials willing to push for internal change? 4 6 2 To a moderate extent
A.4.5 To what extent was it communicated why inputs were or were not taken into account regarding specific commitments? 3.5 5.25 2 To a moderate extent
A.5 National Action Plan Development: Empower 54.17 100 2.6
A.5.1 To what extent did civil society organisations have a significant level of involvement and influence in the development of the framing and narrative (i.e. the story that connects the commitments and describes the country’s approach to open government) for the action plan? 3 4.5 2 To a moderate extent
A.5.2 To what extent did civil society organisations have involvement in the development of commitments for the action plan? 0 6 0 Not at all
A.5.3 To what extent did civil society organisations have influence over which commitments were included in the action plan? 3.5 5.25 2 To a moderate extent
A.5.4 In your opinion, how would you judge the strength of the partnership between key government officials and engaged civil society organisations? 3.5 5.25 2 Strong
A.5.5 How would you rate the quality of the engagement process regarding the National Action Plan as compared to other experiences of civil society engagement by government? 3 3 3 Superior
A.6 Further Comments 0 0
A.6 Please use this space to record any further comments on the development of your country's National Action Plan. 0
B.0 Committments (Section total) 85.88 100 4.215909091
B.2.X Average commitment scores 89 100 4.171875
B.2.X.1 To what extent does the commitment describe the specific activity that will be undertaken? 5.25 5.25 3
B.2.X.2 To what extent does the commitment describe the problem it is trying to solve? 5.25 5.25 3
B.2.X.3 To what extent does the commitment include a breakdown of interim milestones and final deadlines? 5.25 5.25 3
B.2.X.4 To what extent does the commitment set out measurable and verifiable outputs and outcomes against which it can demonstrate fulfillment and improvement? 3.5 5.25 2
B.2.X.5 To what extent does the commitment specify who has ownership and responsibility for its implementation? 5.25 5.25 3
B.2.X.6 To what extent does the commitment specify all government, civil society, multilateral or private sector partners? 3 3 3
B.2.X.7 To what extent do you consider the commitment to be sufficiently challenging? 4.125 4.5 2.75
B.2.X.8 If the commitment is related to a commitment from a previous NAP, do you consider it to be a significant improvement? 1.75 3.75 1.4
B.3 Committments – general 78.79 100 4.333333333
B.3.1 To what extent does the action plan match open government priorities identified by civil society? 6 6 3 To a large extent
B.3.2 In your opinion, how would you judge the extent to which the government is sincere in its commitment to being an open government? 4 6 2 To a moderate extent
B.3.3 To what extent are the broader plans and activities of government consistent with the principles of open government and contents of the action plan? 3 4.5 2 To a moderate extent
B.4.1 Please use this space to record any further comments on the quality and ambition of your country's National Action Plan. 0
C.0 Implementation (Section total) 84 100 4.725
C.1 Implementation: Inform 100 100 5.75
C.1.1 To what extent have OGP commitments been clearly published for a national audience? 6 6 3 To a large extent
C.1.2 To what extent did the government proactively and transparently communicate who the government agency leading on the implementation of the action plan was, including their name, position, department/ministry, and contact details? 5.25 5.25 3 To a large extent
C.1.3 To what extent are there regular progress updates published on the delivery of commitments? 6 6 3 To a large extent
C.2 Implementation: Consult 66.67 100 3.5
C.2.1 To what extent was there there a joint process put in place to review the consultation and engagement process by government and civil society? 3.5 5.25 2 To a moderate extent
C.2.3 To what extent does government consult on the progress of commitments? 3.5 5.25 2 To a moderate extent
C.3 Implementation: Involve 84.44 100 4.75
C.3.1 To what extent is there ongoing outreach to foster participation in OGP? 3.5 5.25 2 To a moderate extent
C.3.2 To what extent is there an ongoing multi-stakeholder forum / steering group to coordinate the OGP process? 6 6 3 To a large extent
C.4 Implementation: Collaborate 84.44 100 4.75
C.4.1 To what extent is there an ongoing joint process in place to monitor the progress of the implementation of the action plan? 6 6 3 To a large extent
C.4.2 To what extent is there ongoing collaboration between government officials and civil society on the implementation of commitments? 3.5 5.25 2 To a moderate extent
C.5 Implementation: Empower 66.67 100 4
C.5.1 In your opinion, how would you judge the ongoing strength of the partnership between key government officials and engaged civil society organisations? 4 6 2 Strong
C.6 Further Comments 0 0
C.6.1 Please use this space to record any further comments on implementation of your country's National Action Plan. 0
T.0 Total Score 82.53 100 247.5928079

See Paraguay’s OGP page: http://www.opengovpartnership.org/country/paraguay